HOUSTON – Following the successful orbital completion of Artemis II, NASA announced Monday its ambitious plan for placing astronauts on the lunar surface: patiently waiting until one of the world's richest men finally feels like getting around to it. The agency, which once independently spearheaded humanity’s greatest space endeavors and landed the first humans on the moon, confirmed it is now primarily banking on the highly individualized and occasionally mercurial timelines of SpaceX’s Elon Musk and Blue Origin’s Jeff Bezos to deliver future lunar missions. This strategic pivot comes after what officials described as "extensive internal discussions regarding the current realities of orbital mechanics and personal wealth accumulation."
"This isn't an abandonment of our core mission; it's a strategic embrace of private-sector innovation and, frankly, their vastly superior personal fortunes," explained NASA Associate Administrator for Human Exploration Reginald "Reggie" Spacely in a press conference that included a prominently displayed chart detailing various billionaires’ current net worth vs. their projected lunar enthusiasm. "We do the meticulous planning, the orbital mechanics, the stringent safety protocols, the astronaut training, and they handle the actual getting-there part. It’s a perfect synergy where we provide the invaluable intellectual property and decades of operational experience, and they provide the… you know… the very large, very expensive rocket that actually goes up." Spacely added that this new approach significantly streamlines budget requests, replacing years of contentious congressional appeals with a single, carefully worded annual email titled "Just Checking In: Moon Stuff?" to the relevant private sector CEOs.
Astronauts, who recently completed grueling training simulations designed for the specific challenges of lunar surface operations, have reportedly been advised to monitor certain public figures' 2 feeds for any sudden announcements regarding lunar vehicle availability or impromptu rocket launches. "Our highly trained, fully qualified astronauts are unequivocally ready to go, obviously. The only major variable now is whether Mr. Musk has finished tweeting about Dogecoin or colonizing Mars long enough to oversee the final thruster calibrations on the Starship, or if Mr. Bezos has concluded his annual 'What if I just bought the moon?' executive retreat and is sufficiently motivated," stated Dr. Aris Thorne, head of NASA's Lunar Logistics Division. "We've developed a complex readiness matrix that includes monitoring various 2 platforms, tracking luxury yacht movements, and even consulting independent astrological charts for optimal 'billionaire mood' windows." Thorne optimistically noted that one or both billionaires typically experience a surge in lunar interest following any minor public slight or competitor's announcement.
Sources within the agency, who requested anonymity as they were currently selling their antique Apollo program memorabilia to fund a conceptual backup launch vehicle composed entirely of repurposed gym equipment, expressed mild concern over the new strategy. "It used to be a matter of engineering and scientific advancement," one veteran launch engineer confided, polishing a framed photo of Neil Armstrong. "Now it's more like trying to schedule a really expensive playdate with two highly competitive kids who both want to be the one to bring the best toy. And one of them keeps insisting on going to Mars, which is frankly a bit of a distraction when the moon is literally right there, staring us in the face." A spokesperson for the newly formed 'Lunar Landing Leisure Alliance,' an organization representing the private contractors, clarified that future lunar missions would proceed "as soon as the principal benefactors feel adequately inspired, competitively charged, or simply bored enough to fund and execute them."
NASA confirmed that contingency plans for extended delays include an emergency GoFundMe campaign for a new public-funded lunar lander, "just in case they all collectively decide Mars is, like, way cooler."
Hambry is a satire publication. All articles are works of fiction.
