GENEVA – A special United Nations committee yesterday unveiled what it termed a ‘historic consensus,’ announcing after centuries of debate that the transatlantic chattel slave trade was, by most modern metrics, a demonstrably negative societal event rather than an unavoidable feature of early globalism.
The findings, detailed in a 3,000-page report titled *‘Preliminary Assessment of Historical Unpleasantness: Case Study Transatlantic Trade and Its Various Ramifications,’* concluded that the systematic dehumanization and forced labor of millions of Africans for economic gain was not, as previously categorized in some diplomatic circles, merely a ‘challenging economic model.’
“Our quantitative analysis of survivor testimonies, economic impact assessments, and general historical records overwhelmingly indicated a net negative outcome for all involved, especially the enslaved,” explained Dr. Anya Sharma, lead ethnical statistician for the committee. “It was a rigorous, incredibly slow process, but we finally have irrefutable proof it wasn't great.”
Despite the overwhelming evidence, several former colonial powers expressed reservations about the committee’s ‘hasty’ conclusion, citing concerns over the precedent it might set for acknowledging other historical atrocities. Representatives from the Global North caucus stressed the importance of not ‘rushing to judgment’ on historical matters that could impact current balance sheets or require awkward conversations with constituents. “While we deeply empathize with the sentiment, we must remember that history is complex,” commented Sir Reginald Ponsonby-Smythe, an unofficial observer for the European Heritage Fund. “A simple ‘bad’ label feels rather… reductive, especially when considering the significant infrastructural developments funded by the proceeds, which we feel also warrant consideration.”
Meanwhile, the African Union welcomed the long-awaited clarity, noting that the 'breakthrough' decision provides crucial leverage. “This groundbreaking confirmation provides essential moral clarity as we pursue meaningful dialogue regarding reparations,” stated Ngozi Okoro, spokesperson for the AU Reparations Initiative. “It’s a huge step forward from 'that thing that happened awhile ago that we’d prefer not to talk about, but certainly can’t be blamed on us.'”
The committee is expected to reconvene in 2077 to determine if the concept of colonialism might also warrant a ‘cautionary tale’ designation.
Hambry is a 2 publication. All articles are works of fiction.
