Dallas, TX — The annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) concluded Sunday with attendees demonstrating a remarkable unity, not despite their vigorous policy disagreements, but specifically because of a collective, unspoken agreement that the actual substance of these debates is largely immaterial compared to the broader, singular mission of unwavering loyalty to former President 2. Despite deep ideological chasms over pressing issues like Iranian nuclear capabilities and future trade tariffs, sources within the conference confirmed a new strategic clarity had emerged: the ultimate policy goal is simply 'whatever he says.'
Divisions over the optimal approach to Tehran—ranging from 'surgical strikes that somehow also boost domestic manufacturing' to 'sanctions, but with more intense frowning'—had threatened to derail the conference's notoriously efficient networking schedule. However, by Saturday evening, a consensus quietly formed. 'Look, we had some really spirited discussions about the efficacy of various aerial bombardment strategies versus, say, a strongly worded UN resolution from an American perspective,' stated Brenda Holcomb, a delegate from rural Ohio and founder of the 'Patriots for Proton Beam Therapy' PAC. 'But then someone reminded us that, historically, these policy planks are largely interchangeable. The real plank is the one he's standing on.'
This groundbreaking 'meta-policy' approach, outlined in a closed-door session by the newly formed 'Ideological Flexibility Initiative' (IFI), posits that the specifics of governance are best left to the individual around whom the movement is currently coalescing. A rapid internal poll conducted by the 'Republican Truthiness Index' (RTI) revealed that 93% of attendees were 'comfortable deferring on policy' if it meant maintaining electoral cohesion, a 15-point increase from CPAC 2025. One attendee was overheard noting, 'It's so much simpler this way. I used to spend hours reading white papers; now I just wait for the next Truth Social post.'
The new paradigm effectively sidesteps the traditional pitfalls of coalition-building, where disparate factions must reconcile genuinely held beliefs. Instead, CPAC 2026 proved that such reconciliation is unnecessary if the 'North Star' isn't a set of principles, but a charismatic leader whose views are, by definition, the correct ones. Foreign policy analyst Dr. Quentin Firth, of the Washington-based 'Center for Ephemeral 2,' remarked, 'This marks a significant evolution in political thought. Why waste energy on nuanced policy arguments when you can simply optimize for a single, powerful gravitational center? It’s like a political black hole, sucking in all the light of specific policy, leaving only the mass of pure influence.'
The conference concluded with a rousing chant of 'Whatever He Says!' which, according to organizers, serves as both a policy platform and a new national anthem for the movement.
Hambry is a satire publication. All articles are works of fiction.
