PALM BEACH, FL – Legendary tennis player Martina Navratilova has reportedly clarified her recent social media comments, asserting that her condemnation of certain political actions and celebration of others is not, in fact, contradictory, but rather a highly refined system of personal preference. The clarification comes after Navratilova labeled one world leader a 'psychopath' for military action, while simultaneously endorsing the demise of another.

“Look, it’s simple really,” Navratilova reportedly explained to an aide, who then relayed the message to Hambry. “If I don’t like you, then any misfortune that befalls you is, by definition, ‘good news.’ If I *really* don’t like you, then any action you take, no matter how common, is ‘psychopathic.’ It’s just basic logic, really.”

The nuanced moral framework, praised by some as refreshingly honest and by others as deeply unhelpful, is expected to revolutionize ethical discourse. Experts suggest this 'Martina Standard' could streamline international relations, allowing global figures to simply declare their personal feelings on adversaries rather than engaging in complex geopolitical analysis.

“It cuts through all the noise,” noted Dr. Evelyn Finch, a fictional ethics professor at the University of Nowhere. “Why bother with international law or humanitarian concerns when you can just say, ‘I hate that guy, so whatever happens to him is fine by me’?”

Critics, however, argue that such a system might lead to an increase in global conflict, particularly if everyone adopts the same approach. Navratilova remains unconcerned, reportedly stating that her personal feelings are, after all, the most important ones.